Righthaven/Denver Post pact made public, criticism follows
Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleFriday
8 July 2011
4:19 p.m.
A new round of criticism erupted Friday over the Righthaven copyright infringement lawsuits after the Las Vegas firm’s litigation contract with the Denver Post was made public.
The contract, obtained by attorneys in one of the Righthaven Colorado cases, is similar to Righthaven’s contract for Las Vegas Review-Journal lawsuits with R-J owner Stephens Media LLC in that the Denver Post receives a 50 percent cut of lawsuit revenue, minus costs.
And it has the same flaws as the Review-Journal contract in that it doesn’t give Righthaven standing to sue, defense attorneys said Friday.
That could doom Righthaven’s pending lawsuits over Denver Post material in federal courts in Colorado, Nevada and South Carolina.
And like the problem with the Review-Journal contract, the disclosure of the Denver Post contract could open Righthaven up to more counterclaims and potentially demands by settling defendants that they get their money back.
Of Righthaven’s 274 lawsuits over newspaper content filed since March 2010, 212 involve Review-Journal material and 62 are over a Denver Post photo and two columns.
Righthaven has filed 57 lawsuits in Colorado over the TSA pat-down photo, and 33 are still open.
It also filed one suit over Denver Post material in South Carolina and four more over Post content in Las Vegas including suits against high-profile targets Matt Drudge and Citadel Broadcasting.
Attorneys at Randazza Legal Group in Las Vegas, who on Friday made the Righthaven/Denver Post lawsuit contract public in a court filing, said the document shows Righthaven has been misleading the federal court in Denver and litigants there about its right to sue.
Similar charges are likely to be made in the South Carolina and Nevada lawsuits over Post material.
The "Copyright Alliance Agreement’’ with Post owner MediaNews Group Inc. has "the same flaws that have plagued Righthaven’s agreement with Stephens Media LLC: Righthaven does not own the copyrighted work, nor any component rights to it,’’ the attorneys wrote in a court filing.
"While the jurisdiction and the copyrighted work at issue have changed in Righthaven’s Colorado cases, compared to its Nevada ones, the unlawful scheme used by Righthaven is the same. As such, it should be treated with equal prejudice. Righthaven’s operations must be dismantled as unlawful and contrary to the Copyright Act – to say nothing of the Righthaven model’s inherent deceit and exploitation,’’ the attorneys charged in their court filing.
Righthaven hasn’t yet responded to these assertions and it’s unknown if Righthaven and MediaNews are rewriting their lawsuit contract to better establish Righthaven’s standing – as Righthaven has tried to do with Stephens Media.
While Righthaven has lost three lawsuits on fair use rulings, the standing issue is equally critical in Righthaven cases.
Righthaven critics say copyrights are meant to be used for those creating and using news content for artistic and informational purposes – and that copyrights shouldn’t be bartered for financially-driven lawsuits.
In Righthaven's no-warning lawsuits, critics say even defendants with valid fair use arguments are coerced into settling by threats of website domain name seizures and statutory damages of up to $150,000.
Righthaven, however, maintains it was created to deal with rampant online infringements of newspaper material and the only people complaining about it are those in the "infringement community."
U.S. District Judge John Kane in Denver hasn’t yet indicated when he’ll rule on the standing issue in the Colorado cases. On May 19, he put all the Colorado cases on hold pending resolution of the standing issue.
Righthaven's Nevada lawsuits are similarly stalled as two judges have rejected Righthaven's standing to sue and two more are threatening to do the same thing.
Share
Discussion 5 comments
Comments are moderated by VegasInc editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their VEGAS INC account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
If you have a LasVegasSun.com account, you are already registered.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Can old Sahara site become a symbol of Las Vegas’ rebound?
- With Ron Paul’s infiltrators, clout of state GOP party further erodes
- School District to lay off 1,015 teachers, literacy specialists
- Coolican: Courageous first move could bring success to north portion of the Strip
- North Las Vegas slashes budget, clearing way for 200 layoffs
Chunky says:
Righthaven's demise seems to be inevitable at this point. The sooner the better.
Once again, Chunky tips his hat to Mr. Steve Green for his long term commitment to reporting this story.
That's what Chunky thinks!
Chunky
And not just bankruptcy and closing down but those responsible being brought to justice which includes Gibson, Mangano, and officials from both Stephens Media and MediaNews who concocted this fraud.
I'm sure the parts regarding the "Righthaven transaction" are not included, but otherwise it sounds like it reads the same.
As always, I'd love to see the actual documents, both the MediaNews and newly amended (again) SM agreements. In particular I want to see if Section 3 in the SM document has been changed and what the corresponding section, if any, in the MN document says.
Has any amendments been made to the MN document? It will say a lot if it can be determined that MN won't agree to the latest version with the 5yr clause preventing buy-back or reversion of rights.
Ken, it is the actions being brought by Eiser that are most likely to be a royal pain for Gibson in particular to deal with as those actions should force a decision as to whether or not RH is a law firm.
Also, I doubt MN had a hand in concocting this operation, but rather made a (poor) decision to use it. Gibson must be a good salesman.
Chunky says:
Lawyers prosecuting lawyers sounds highly unlikely but he agrees that Gibson and his associates should be held accountable for the abuse of the defendants and our justice system.
That's what Chunky thinks!
Dean Singleton should be worried. Media Newsgroup is just as culpable as Righthaven and Stephens Media. They should start preparing to open their checkbooks.