Las Vegas Sun Newsthe courts:
Religious, progressive groups join fight against Wynn tip-sharing mandate
Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Wynn Las Vegas appealed a District Court ruling that the required sharing of casino dealers’ tips with supervisors violates a state law. The case is currently before the state Supreme Court.
Tuesday
2 October 2012
2 a.m.
Related coverage
The legal battle over tip-sharing at Wynn Las Vegas is turning into a community free-for-all, with religious and progressive groups and another union now weighing in against the policy.
Wynn has appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court last year's ruling by a Clark County District Court judge finding Wynn's required sharing of casino dealers' tips with supervisors violates a state law.
The case is in the briefing stage at the Supreme Court, and the court has permitted several interested parties to participate by filing advisory friend-of-the-court briefs.
The latest to file briefs, or to request permission to do so, on Monday were groups called Interfaith Worker Justice, Churches of Southern Nevada, the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada (PLAN) and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1637, which represents more than 900 employees in the local bus system. They're all represented by Henderson attorney Christian Gabroy.
"Wynn’s use of the dealers’ tips to compensate the dealers’ non-tipped or nominally tipped supervisors, whom the Wynn is neglecting to adequately compensate itself, is immoral, improper, and not in compliance with (state law), particularly in light of the great wealth possessed by the Wynn and its clear ability to adequately compensate those supervisors itself," the religious groups' brief says. "Such actions by the Wynn are not in compliance with Judeo-Christian values or any faith-based value system that respects the dignity of those who must labor to provide for the needs of themselves and their families."
The PLAN and Transit Union brief charged: ''Reversing the district court will result in a substantial and inequitable shift of wealth from low-wage workers, who are struggling to support themselves and their families, to already highly profitable businesses that can, and should, bear the burden of adequately compensating their non-tipped or nominally tipped employees.''
The Transport Workers Union, which represents Wynn and Caesars Palace dealers, earlier filed its own brief opposed to the tip-sharing program.
Wynn, however, says only a minority of dealers have complained about the tip-sharing policy and it has picked up support in the case from the powerful Culinary Union, which says tip-sharing arrangements are commonplace and that the state shouldn't meddle with them.
Also supporting Wynn are the casino industry through the Nevada Resort Association, the Nevada Restaurant Association and Don Laughlin's Riverside hotel-casino, where supervisors have long shared in dealers' tips.
"How tips are pooled — whether the debate is about a (casino) boxman or a barman — is a business decision that employers should have the freedom to make and experiment with," says the brief by the industry associations and the Laughlin casino. They're represented by law firms including the Las Vegas office of Lewis and Roca LLP.
"Whether by implementing an incentive-based compensation structure like tip pools, stock options, or profit sharing; offering alternative work schedules; setting a company-wide policy limiting email correspondence on off hours; or any number of unique solutions, companies need to be creative in attracting and retaining high-performing employees, reducing turnover and in motivating their workers to deliver better service," the industry brief said.
When Steve Wynn brought casino dealer/supervisor tip-sharing to the Strip in 2006, he said the policy was aimed at improving customer service by motivating supervisors to better serve gamblers and to make it easier to recruit bosses from the dealer staff.
Clark County District Court Judge Kenneth Cory struck down the policy last year, finding it conflicted with a Nevada law allowing the sharing of tips by workers in the same job classification but barring companies from directly benefiting from tip-sharing pools.
In this case, an attorney for the dealers says Wynn's direct benefit is that it doesn't have to pay the supervisors some $5 million per year being taken from the dealers.
At the Supreme Court, oral arguments in the appeal have not yet been scheduled. That means a ruling likely won't be issued until well into 2013 or later.
Share
Join the Discussion:
Previous Discussion:
Discussion 2 comments
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Most Popular
- Genting planning art exhibits, dragon dancers — even before Resorts World opens
- For Tom Cunningham and most other stabbing victims, much pain, no justice
- County OKs replacing Strip eyesore with casino preview centers
- North Las Vegas set to decide on controversial mortgage-seizure plan
- Dynasty hotel-casino could open in Las Vegas by 2015
While it is true that tipped employees sometimes do split tips, usually not with management. Culinary Union appear to have their facts twisted and they seem bought and paid for. NObama in 2012!
Of all people, I would think Steve Wynn would be against redistribution of wealth.
Steve Wynn's position is againgt redistribution of wealth. His own wealth. Republicans have no problem with redistribution as long as they are taking from their employees and giving it to other employees.
The solution is obvious, just give the workers raises and nobody gets tips..........
Weinberg has been shafting the tipped employees for decades now--anyone remember the old showrooms--he screwed all those people and now they are all low wage employees while he collects $200 a ticket and charges $10 for a soda.
He tried to shaft the dealers as far back as the treasure island---everyone in the business knows he floated the idea of flat rate dealer pay back then and then no one applied for the jobs with any experience--all break in dealers applied and then they changed their tune.
Weinberg is a classic fascist--the rules apply to everyone else except me and my rich buddies who believe it is ok to steal from the employees and give it to the managers. He will go far in china with his communist buddies--no insurance, no overtime, no minimum wage, no 5 day work week, no benefits of any kind--just work and shut up and it you don't like it we will roll the tanks over you and kill you.
this is not "redistribution" as someone has said, but old fashioned stealing. He is stealing tips from many different groups of tipped employees and handing it to managers who he doesn't want to pay the correct amount of money himself--in this way, he saves money and screws the tip earners in one shot. He has been against tipping from the beginning and this is just the latest round in a long fight to lower pay at the bottom so he doesn't have to pay more to the middle management to get people to work. If your making 80k as a dealer, why become a manager and make 60K with more hassle? This was his solution to all the departments--shaft the tip earners so i don't have to pay more to the managers.
OH!
So it's only selective redistribution?
Wealth is in the eye of the beholder. You may make more that I, therefore, I wish to have your wealth shared with me.
But since I make more than someone else, why should I share with them??
AH SO!
I am of the belief.....your services to me that require a tip are given to you for services rendered. And what did this supervisor DO FOR ME to earn that? NOTHING, that's what. I hope they pound Wynn into the ground on this one. If these supervisors were worth a raise..Wynn would have given it to them. No ? then I guess they're not worth one. So you pick the pockets of the dealers? Sounds like the old mob shake downs.