Bankrupt Las Vegas businessman must still repay casino markers

Friday
27 July 2012
5 p.m.

A Las Vegas businessman who declared personal bankruptcy must still repay the worthless markers he wrote at two casinos, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled.

The court refused to set aside the bum check convictions of Martin R. Brown, who wrote $20,000 in worthless markers at Wynn Las Vegas and a $25,000 bogus marker at the Bellagio.

Because of a downturn in his business, Brown, who was described as a lover of gambling, filed for personal bankruptcy. He then wrote the worthless checks on his M&I Bank account, which was closed.

The casinos filed criminal charges against him. Brown was convicted after trials of passing the bad checks. He was placed on five years' probation and ordered in each case to make a $21,625 payment to each casino.

He was also ordered to stay out of casinos for the purpose of gambling. Brown was directed to perform 16 hours a month of community service unless he was a full-time worker or student.

Brown appealed, arguing the state's bad-check law was unconstitutional because it violates his federal right to declare bankruptcy. He maintained the state could not prosecute him after his debts had been discharged in bankruptcy.

The Supreme Court said the federal law does not prevent a state from beginning or continuing a criminal action after an individual has filed a petition for bankruptcy.

The court said Brown failed to show that criminal prosecutions violated the federal Supremacy Clause.

The court also rejected Brown's argument that the criminal prosecution in the two cases was improper debt collection and the casinos were barred by the bankruptcy discharge of the debt.

The two decisions upheld the rulings of District Judge David Barker.

In a third case, the Supreme Court rejected the petition of New York-New York for a pre-trial summary judgment in connection with a shooting in July 2007 in which four people were injured.

The resort was sued by Carrie Zeravica on grounds it was negligent in permitting the shooting by Stephen Zegream, who said at the time he was despondent,

The court said the New York-New York failed to show "extraordinary relief is warranted" at this time in the suit.

Share

Join the Discussion:

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion:

Discussion 9 comments

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Must be nice to be able to use the State and the threat of prison to enforce your debts.

    Casinos have it made out here in Nevada and the Courts have absolutely NO shame in doing their dirty work.

    What a disgrace.

  2. Vegas Delight,

    Check the laws, those laws are not just in place for casinos. You write a bad check to anyone in this state and the courts are involved if the person you write the check to presses the matter.

    I know many feel it is fun to pick on the industry that pays your way of life in this state but they are not just the selected ones in this type of matter.

  3. From this ruling, it is unclear how the court would view the collectability of a marker obtained legally. If a person robbed a bank would they still be required to pay restitution if they filed for bankruptcy? It seems unlikely that the courts would tolerate the use of the law to shield a convicted person from his criminal sentence.

  4. Let's see, the jerk wrote bad checks in the amount of 45 thou. Hm, I wonder how much his lawyers cost to fight making them good? Aside from that, he's a prime example of just how far down the slime pit some citizens have fallen. Make deal? Sign a contract? Incur a debt? No problem. Just renege on it and walk away. How we have fallen as a society! When I was younger, a handshake was as good as the written word for most of us. All we had was our reputations and they were precious to us. Not so today. Today, it's acceptable to be a cad, to lie, to cheat and to run out on ones obligations. Honor? Integrity? Morals? They count for little today, it seems!

  5. I agree with vegaslee. This ruling protects all those small and large businesses in the state who accept checks. And, consider the alternative, my friends. If the court would have given an opposite result, people would know they could write bad checks to a business after declaring bankruptcy with no consequences. What if it were YOUR business involved in such a scam?

  6. I think Laws should apply equally to People AND Corporations. Since Corporations are now People why should They be able to walk away from their obligations (You Do Remember Wall Street Banks) and Individuals Not?
    There is something very weird about Republican Logic wanting it both ways - Like blowing smoke out of .........

  7. BTW, this law does not just apply to writing checks to businesses.

    If someone writes you a bad check and won't pay up, turn it over to the D.A. They will collect it or take the person to court.

    We are NOT the only state with this law. Ca. has ha it for over 30 years and I am sure there are other states that do also.

  8. Boo Hoo..Boo Hoo....poor Baby !! This guy is something else. I think the casinos have to be MORE aggressive with the markers they give out...and for sure do a better background check. They need to get title to their homes,cars,boats...anything worth a dime they can claim and hold until jerks like this cough up the money they owe. The casinos seem to be shooting themselves in the foot lately what gives?

  9. We have one appellate court in this state -- and its' time has been taken from other matters. Sanctions against counsel seem appropriate. First, the bankruptcy statute which provides for stays of state court actions expressly excludes state criminal proceedings from the bankruptcy stay (11 USC 362(b)(1)). Second, existing case law in the 9th Circuit and nationally has held that the bankruptcy stay does not apply to prevent state criminal prosecution (In re Gruntz [9th Circuit 2000], 202 F. 3d 1074, and Kelly v. Robinson [1986] 479 US 36.

Most Popular

Follow VEGAS INC

Answer This!

Will online gaming hurt brick-and-mortar casinos?

TopDocs 2012 Cover TopLawyers 2012 Cover