DEVELOPMENT:
MGM: CityCenter sound, apart from Harmon hotel tower
The Harmon tower at CityCenter is shown while under construction in July 2009 on the Las Vegas Strip.
Saturday
23 July 2011
2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Harmon flaws haven’t brought big fallout (5-27-2009)
- Perini redirects blame for errors at Harmon (2-9-2009)
- Adaptation or ‘disaster’?: Depends on your view of the Harmon (2-8-2009)
- County wants proof CityCenter structures are free of defects (2-6-2009)
- Watchers were not watched (1-15-2009)
- How did CityCenter tower flaws persist? (1-8-2009)
- MGM Mirage cancels CityCenter condo project (1-7-2009)
- CityCenter hotel project slowed by corrective work (9-17-2008)
MGM Resorts International stopped work on the Strip’s Harmon hotel in January 2009 after disclosing that contractors had made significant structural errors, including the improper placement of steel used to hold up the tower. But unclear at the time was whether construction mistakes may have occurred elsewhere in the $8.5 billion
CityCenter complex.
On Friday, MGM Resorts, citing information from Clark County building officials, said the rest of the largest privately funded construction project in the country is structurally sound. That’s the conclusion of a verification plan submitted by MGM Resorts and approved by the county.
Engineers hired by MGM Resorts to double-check the work performed by CityCenter contractors have given all of the buildings under review — except for Harmon — a clean bill of health, MGM Resorts said.
“Clark County reviewed the results and is satisfied that the other buildings at CityCenter meet code,” MGM Resorts spokeswoman Yvette Monet said.
After news of the Harmon’s structural problems came to light in 2008, county building officials ordered MGM Resorts to verify that other CityCenter buildings were safe.
In a letter to the county outlining its verification plan, MGM Resorts said its engineers were to perform “X-Ray or electronic imaging” tests on concrete slab floors, columns and walls to determine the placement of steel and other supports. The rebar problems were obscured because they were buried in concrete, building experts said at the time.
The county requested an engineering review of the Aria, Vdara, Mandarin Oriental and Harmon. County officials didn’t include the twin Veer towers in their request. Those towers were inspected by Kleinfelder, a different company than the one that missed the errors uncovered at the Harmon.
Converse Consultants performed most of the private inspection work at CityCenter. The engineering firm issued 62 reports stating that the structural steel at the Harmon was built to code. In reality, it was placed improperly on several floors, requiring a costly fix for MGM Resorts.
MGM Resorts cited delays and cost overruns in its decision to halt construction on the Harmon, which sits empty and unfinished at nearly half its original height of 49 stories. In a countersuit filed against CityCenter contractor Perini Building Co. last year, MGM claims the building is unusable and unsafe. An engineer hired by MGM to verify the work at Harmon recently disclosed to the county that the building might not withstand an earthquake.
Perini filed an initial suit against MGM last year for nearly $500 million in unpaid construction work. The contractor says it’s able to fix problems at the Harmon but that MGM would rather not complete the building as part of a litigation strategy against Perini. MGM says it has paid most of the bills owed subcontractors.
Engineers and other building experts not involved in the construction of CityCenter say the building — notwithstanding the problem in marketing a hotel with a error-prone past — is probably fixable, but at great cost.
Pacific Coast Steel, the subcontractor responsible for the rebar installation at Harmon, also worked on other buildings at CityCenter. The firm was fined by the Nevada State Contractors Board for work at the Harmon.
Although county officials blamed the systemic nature of the problems at the Harmon on two Converse inspectors who signed off on the faulty work, some involved with the inspection process noted that others also are at fault for relying on inspectors who lacked experience. The contractors involved in overseeing the job also would have done their own visual inspections to make sure work was performed properly. Perini was also fined in connection with the Harmon.
County officials won’t talk about their conclusions on CityCenter.
County spokeswoman Stacey Welling said it would be inappropriate for the county to comment on CityCenter given pending litigation between Perini and MGM Resorts.
Perini officials couldn’t be reached for comment Friday.
Share
Discussion 2 comments
Comments are moderated by VegasInc editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their VEGAS INC account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
If you have a LasVegasSun.com account, you are already registered.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Live from Billboard Music Awards: Stevie Wonder closes with ‘Superstition’; Adele wins 12 awards
- Firefighters extinguish blaze in east valley
- Cancer claims life of Bee Gees co-founder Robin Gibb, 62
- Travel business rebounding as agents adapt to tech-savvy generation
- My column: Legislative leader to unveil sweeping political reforms

Shouldn't the fact that the rest of city centers buildings being built to code indicate that the Harmon building was a deliberate act of sabatoge and not human error?
The steel worker forman should have realized that the rerod was getting placed upside down hundreds of times and corrected the mistake.
Even a simple peasant boy like myself would never have made such an error in my daze of concrete construction.
This never should have happened.
(1) with modern technology it is both practical and economic to document the "as built" condition and rapidly compare it to the "as drawn" condition at each step in construction.
(2) "Trust but Verify" is always required all the way up the line. You can't rely on inspection reports until you have validated them by inspections which are sufficiently numerous for the level of risk. Someone should have been inspecting the inspectors. The buck stops at Clark County.
(3) Everyone was a fault here -- some more than others, but everyone. They and their insurers can figure out who will pay what percentage later, but that building needs to come down or be corrected now. As built it is dangerous.
Yea..sure...same contractor...same workmen...same inspectors...sure, all the other parts are perfectly all right, it's just that little tiny mistake on one building that should be overlooked anyway. Yea..sure..
If they open it I'll never go inside the Harmon period.