Station Casinos allowed to proceed with lawsuit against Henderson
Thursday
21 July 2011
3:45 p.m.
A District Court judge today allowed Station Casinos to proceed with its lawsuit against Henderson over a land-use decision involving the Roadhouse, a defunct casino on Boulder Highway slated for redevelopment.
However, Judge Gloria Sturman struck down one of Station’s three claims against the city involving an alleged violation of the state’s open meeting law. Station had no proof that the law was violated, she said, also finding that deposing city officials would have a chilling effect on the right of public officials to seek guidance from their attorneys.
The lawsuit could delay indefinitely a development that would yield millions of dollars in construction spending and at least 16 full-time construction jobs, a Roadhouse spokeswoman said.
Today’s two-hour hearing was a strongly worded showdown between one of Henderson’s largest employers and the city.
Station has accused city officials of breaking the law in granting competitor Roadhouse owner Robert McMackin approvals to develop the site. The casino giant also claims city officials met in secret, violating the open meeting law, to discuss turning down Station’s appeal of that decision. City Council members and staff have submitted sworn affidavits that no laws were violated.
“I’m a bit jaded when I hear a public official saying, ‘Trust us, we didn’t do anything wrong,’ ” Todd Bice, an attorney for Station Casinos, said at the hearing.
Attorneys for the city allege Station executives have harassed and intimidated city officials to get what they want.
“Sunset Station keeps ratcheting up the pressure on the city,” Henderson Senior Assistant City Attorney Christine Guerci-Nyhus said. “When they can’t get it through administratively they get it through litigation. Then they go to our staff members.”
After the city rejected Station’s appeal, one of the company’s lobbyists — a former city attorney for Henderson — met with Henderson’s assistant director of community development to encourage him to seek the advice of outside counsel. The attorney recommended by Station divulged confidential information to Bice after meeting with the Henderson official, attorneys for the city and McMackin say.
“He was intimidated … and made to believe his job was in jeopardy,” McMackin’s attorney, Nicholas Santoro, said. “This reeks.”
The Roadhouse first obtained a use permit in 1988. McMackin acquired the property in 1992, after a 1991 state law required that casinos with licenses allowing an unlimited number of slot machines must build at least 200 hotel rooms and other amenities. That law exempted older casinos so long as they keep permits current.
The original permit for the Roadhouse lapsed in 2006 after the city denied McMackin’s request for a two-year extension. But the city never revoked it, instead issuing temporary use permits intended to preserve McMackin’s grandfathered gaming license.
After determining that the original permit still existed, the city in November approved a design review application by McMackin to remodel the Roadhouse.
Station filed an appeal but the city rejected it, saying it was deficient. Station never appealed the denial to the Planning Commission.
The city claims Station didn’t exhaust its legal remedies to appeal the design review before filing suit and that the company could have corrected its appeal to include more relevant information.
But Station argued the city’s staff was wrong to reject the appeal without letting the Planning Commission hear it, suggesting that the city didn’t want to risk a difference of opinion by the commission. Also, the original use permit is invalid because it had lapsed, making the design review approval moot, the company said.
The city said Station has no legal standing to challenge the city’s land-use decision. The casino giant has no ownership interest in the Roadhouse and can’t point to any specific damage it might or will suffer as a result of the approved design review, city attorneys say.
The city favors the Roadhouse project because it will create jobs at a time when they are desperately needed, Santoro said. Station has succeeded, he said, in handcuffing the efforts of a developer who is ready to move forward.
“This is an attempt by Station to destroy competition,” he said.
“What this is really about is enforcing the rule of law,” Bice shot back.
Share
Discussion 1 comments
Comments are moderated by VegasInc editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their VEGAS INC account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
If you have a LasVegasSun.com account, you are already registered.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Live from Billboard Music Awards: Stevie Wonder closes with ‘Superstition’; Adele wins 12 awards
- Firefighters extinguish blaze in east valley
- Cancer claims life of Bee Gees co-founder Robin Gibb, 62
- Travel business rebounding as agents adapt to tech-savvy generation
- My column: Legislative leader to unveil sweeping political reforms

I thought Stations loved locals? I guess they don't love unemployed locals and competition.
Stations love locals $$$$$, and nothing else. They have slowly but surely bought up everything in the Henderson/Green Valley area so you can't even go to a relatively small casino and perhaps, just maybe, have some relaxing time and not lose your shirt, your car, your home...etc. It isn't like they aren't posting some very nice profits, and employees are disgruntled as they are working twice as hard, with less benefits, no raises, then they were a few years ago since Stations let a whole lot of people go....to save money, of course. The "brothers" still own the majority and their UFC is it??? is making billions...ahem, note, not millions, but billions! Seems like if they just loosened up their machines a wee bit, gave better service, and returned to treating "locals" like they truly want their business, stopped trying to get every last place either out of business completely or under their control....customers might return. We're not...I'll make the drive 20 minutes away to go to a NON-STATION casino because I am fed up! There used to be comp's, there used to be a change person that would get to you in less than 20 minutes, the buffet used to have good food, the employees used to care............not any more and this lawsuit just continues the reality of Stations as a money-hungry, greedy, oppressive "business" who likes gimmicky phrases but out and out lies about their intentions and their service. Let's tell it like it is for a change why don't we....stations love your money so bend over rover.........
I only go to a station casino when they offer me free play and free meals-I support smaller local casinos who really love the locals all the time not just in a cheesy tv commercial
Station has accused city officials of breaking the law in granting competitor Roadhouse owner Robert McMackin approvals to develop the site
I guess it is ok for Stations to break the law as long as they benefit. The Fertittas have a history of questionable business practices as evidenced by this article.
http://survivethejivealive.blogspot.com/...
Didn't see Stations whining & crying when Nevada regulators let them buy up all the competition around Lake Mead & Rancho. No siree, that was just fine with them. Now, someone wants to offer a little competition and they're acting like Chicken Little and going about crying, "The sky is falling." We need more, not less, competition to keep these guys honest.