Nevada AG defends robosigning probe

Saturday
17 December 2011
2 a.m.

Click to enlarge photo

Catherine Cortez Masto

Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto is disputing claims by a foreclosure processor that her office has improperly outsourced a foreclosure document robosigning investigation.

The claim was made Friday by Lender Processing Services Inc., a big national foreclosure processor based in Florida, after Masto’s office hit the company with a fraud lawsuit.

LPS complained Masto’s lawsuit included sensational, misleading and false allegations and that its attempts to cooperate in Masto’s robosigning probe have been frustrated by Masto outsourcing its investigation to a Washington, D.C., law firm “in apparent violation of Nevada law.”

"Instead of accepting responsibly for their fraudulent conduct in Nevada and across the country, LPS is trying to distract from allegations in our complaint," Masto said in response. "The fact that LPS is focused on attacking attorneys — with demonstrably false legal conclusions — rather than on the merits of the case is telling. We are prepared to go forward on the merits of our filed complaint and will leave the rest to the courts."

This isn’t the first time companies being investigated by Masto have raised the outsourcing issue.

Homebuilders Pulte Homes Inc. and Lennar Corp. sued Masto in March 2010 claiming she had hired the firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC in Washington, D.C., in violation of the builders' due process rights for a probe of alleged predatory lending practices.

The homebuilders complained that firm — the same business named in the robosigning investigation — was affiliated with unions and had been hired on a contingency basis, giving it an inappropriate profit interest.

Pulte later settled with Nevada, paying $475,000 to close an investigation of deceptive trade practices.

Lennar’s suit against Masto was closed under undisclosed terms in September.

Share

Discussion 1 comment

Comments are moderated by VegasInc editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their VEGAS INC account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Not claiming their innocence, but claiming impropriety in outsourcing the case. This and handful of other robo-signing companies are directly responsible for the collapse of the housing market by participating in the illegal practice of FORGERY. Signing of documents without the consent or knowledge of the parties involved (well the banks knew full well what was going on), that is why they were offered a premium for falsifying documents at the staggering rate of 1 per every 2 minutes. The people responsible should be sentenced to a minimum of 45 days for each offense (typical of a conviction in the State of Nevada for forgery), and that includes the banks that allowed this process to happen all in the name of GREED.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated by VegasInc editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

Commenting requires registration.

If you have a LasVegasSun.com account, you are already registered.

Follow VEGAS INC

20 Answers

Tell us what you think.

Answer This!

Will the north end of the Strip ever be as vibrant as the south end?